The Alignment of Business Process In Event Organizer And Enterprise Architecture Using TOGAF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12962/j24068535.v17i1.a734Abstract
Event organizer is a company which engaged in event organizing, PR, and advertising. A suitable information systems that fit company's business needs are required so the company can adapt themselves in this globalization era. Information systems had an important role in order to support the company’s business process and its performance. An example of applied information systems that have been widely used by companies is enterprise architecture. Currently, enterprise architecture has been used by many enterprises to be able connect between the planning and the technology implementation to the current business in the company. Enterprise Architecture Planning (EAP) is a method in enterprise architecture which can provides alignment between business and information technology by defining company’s needs. Main components of EAP are data architecture, applications, and technology. The framework that will be used to develop EAP on this research is TOGAF ADM with phases starting from preliminary phase, requirements management, architecture vision, business architecture, information systems architectures, technology architecture, opportunities & solutions, and migration planning. A result on this research will be a blueprint of enterprise architecture model that an event organizer can use in supporting its business. The blueprint contains the current used information systems and the ideal information systems planned by the authors.
Downloads
References
J. F. Andry, “Audit of IT Governance Based on COBIT 5 Assessments: A Case Study,” J. Teknol. dan Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 27–34, 2016.
A. A. Latif and N. Hanifi, “Analyzing IT Function Using COBIT 4.1 – A Case Study of Malaysian Private University,” J. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 406–408, 2013.
J. F. Andry, “Performance Measurement IT of Process Capability Model Based on COBIT: A Study Case,” J. Ilm. Data Manaj. Dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 21–26, 2016.
C. Meriyem, S. Adil, and M. Hicham, “IT Governance Ontology Building Process : Example of developing Audit Ontology,” Int. J. Comput. Tech. -–, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 134–141, 2015.
F. Maciel Reichert and P. A. Zawislak, “Technological Capability and Firm Performance,” J. Technol. Manag. Innov, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 20–35, 2014.
P. W. Veasey, “Use of enterprise architectures in managing strategic change,” vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 420–436, 2001.
R. Y. K. S. E. S, “Pengembangan Model Arsitektur Enterprise Untuk Perguruan Tinggi,” Juti, vol. 8, no. Gambar 1, pp. 9–18, 2010.
Y. Parizeau, “Enterprise Architecture for Complex Government and the Challenge of Government On-line in Canada, Dalhoussie University,” A Res. Proj., 2002.
L. Astri and F. Gaol, “Information System Strategic Planning with Enterprise Architecture Planning,” BINUS Univ., vol. 7, no. msi.binus.ac.id, pp. 23–27, 2013.
H. Kerzner, Strategic Planning for Project Management using a Project Management Maturity Model. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.
K. Surendro, Pengembangan Rencana Induk Sistem Informasi. Bandung: Informatika, 2009.
B. T. Hazen, L. Kung, C. G. Cegielski, and L. Allison Jones-Farmer, “Performance expectancy and use of enterprise architecture: training as an intervention,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 180–196, 2014.
J. Randy V. Bradley Renée M. E. Pratt Terry Anthony Byrd Christina N. Outlay Donald E. Wynn, “Enterprise architecture, IT effectiveness and the mediating role of IT alignment in US hospitals,” Inf. Syst. J., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 10–19, 2012.
S. Kotusev, M. Singh, and I. Storey, “A Frameworks-Free Look at Enterprise Architecture,” J. Enterp. Archit., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2017.
S. Aswati, M. I. Fahmi, and K. Anwar, “Enterprise Application Architecture Framework Parking Information System Using TOGAF ADM (Case Study: Brayan Shopping Centre),” no. 8, pp. 10–19, 2016.
M. Sajid and K. Ahsan, “Role of Enterprise Architecture in Healthcare Organizations and Knowledge-Based Medical Diagnosis System,” J. Inf. Syst. Technol. Manag., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 181–192, 2016.
T. O. Group, TOGAF Version 9. San Fransisco: The Open Group, 2009.
L. Urbaczewski and S. Mrdalj, “A comparison of enterprise architecture frameworks,” Issues Inf. Syst., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 18–23, 2006.
A. Tang, J. Han, and P. Chen, “A comparative analysis of architecture frameworks,” Proc. - Asia-Pacific Softw. Eng. Conf. APSEC, no. January 2004, pp. 640–647, 2004.
Suryadi and J. F. Andry, “Perancangan Enterprise Architecture Mengunakan Togaf Architecture Development Method ( Studi Kasus : Yakuza Gym Jakarta Barat ),” Semin. Nas. TEKNOKA, vol. 2, no. 2502, 2017.
T. O. Group, “Togaf V9.1 Module 1 Management Overview,” in ADM Basic Principles, 2011, pp. 1–34.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in JUTI unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-in-Chief.
JUTI open access articles are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
