UAV LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION USING CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK FEATURE MAP WITH A COMBINATION OF MACHINE LEARNING

Erika Maulidiya, Chastine Fatichah, Nanik Suciati, Fajar Baskoro

Abstract


In geographic analysis, land cover plays an important role in everything from environmental analysis to sustainable planning methods and physical geography studies. The Indonesian National Standard (SNI 7645:2014) classifies vegetation analysis based on density. There are four categories of vegetation density index: non-vegetation, bare, medium, and high. Technically, vegetation data can be obtained through remote sensing. Satellite and UAV data are two types of data used in remote sensing to collect information. This research will analyze land cover based on vegetation density information that can be collected through remote sensing. Based on vegetation density information from remote sensing, the information can help in land processing, Land Cover Classification is carried out based on vegetation density. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have been trained extensively to apply their properties to land cover classification. This research will evaluate features extracted from Convolutional Neural Networks (ResNet 50, Inception-V3, DenseNet 121) which have previously been trained and continued with Decision Tree algorithms, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and eXtreme Gradient Boosting to perform classification. From the comparison results of classification tests between machine learning methods, Support Vector Machine is superior to other machine learning methods. This is proven by the accuracy results obtained at 85% with feature extraction using ResNet-50 where the processing time is 8 minutes. Followed by the second-best model, namely ResNet-50 with XGBoost which obtained accuracy results of 82% with a processing time of 55 minutes. Meanwhile, the use of feature extraction using the DenseNet-121 method was obtained using a combination of the Support Vector Machine method and the XGBoost method with the accuracy obtained being 81%.


Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Warren, K. Hergoualc’h, J. B. Kauffman, D. Murdiyarso, and R. Kolka, “An appraisal of Indonesia’s immense peat carbon stock using national peatland maps: Uncertainties and potential losses from conversion,” Carbon Balance Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1186/s13021-017-0080-2.

“Tropical and Subtropical Wetlands Distribution version 2 - CIFOR Knowledge,” CIFOR. Accessed: Jun. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/dataset/0058/

G. Hope, U. Chokkalingam, and S. Anwar, “The stratigraphy and fire history of the Kutai Peatlands, Kalimantan, Indonesia,” Quat. Res., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 407–417, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.yqres.2005.08.009.

L. Tacconi, “Preventing fires and haze in Southeast Asia,” Nat. Clim. Chang., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 640–643, 2016, doi: 10.1038/nclimate3008.

Z. Xu, K. Guan, N. Casler, B. Peng, and S. Wang, “A 3D convolutional neural network method for land cover classification using LiDAR and multi-temporal Landsat imagery,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., vol. 144, pp. 423–434, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.08.005.

Y. Sari, Y. F. Arifin, N. Novitasari, and M. R. Faisal, “Effect of Feature Engineering Technique for Determining Vegetation Density,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 655–661, 2022, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130776.

B. Bansod, R. Singh, R. Thakur, and G. Singhal, “A comparision between satellite based and drone based remote sensing technology to achieve sustainable development: A review,” J. Agric. Environ. Int. Dev., vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 383–407, 2017, doi: 10.12895/jaeid.20172.690.

Y. Heryadi and E. Miranda, Land cover classification based on sentinel-2 satellite imagery using convolutional neural network model: A case study in Semarang Area, Indonesia, vol. 830, no. January. Springer International Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-14132-5_15.

M. Jogin, Mohana, M. S. Madhulika, G. D. Divya, R. K. Meghana, and S. Apoorva, “Feature extraction using convolution neural networks (CNN) and deep learning,” 2018 3rd IEEE Int. Conf. Recent Trends Electron. Inf. Commun. Technol. RTEICT 2018 - Proc., pp. 2319–2323, 2018, doi: 10.1109/RTEICT42901.2018.9012507.

S. Benyahia, B. Meftah, and O. Lézoray, “Multi-features extraction based on deep learning for skin lesion classification,” Tissue Cell, vol. 74, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tice.2021.101701.

G. W. Intyanto, “Klasifikasi Citra Bunga dengan Menggunakan Deep Learning: CNN (Convolution Neural Network),” J. Arus Elektro Indones., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 80, 2021, doi: 10.19184/jaei.v7i3.28141.

K. E. E. Rani and S. Baulkani, “Construction of Deep Learning Model using RESNET 50 for Schizophrenia Prediction from rsFMRI Images,” pp. 1–14, 2022.

J. Cao, M. Yan, Y. Jia, X. Tian, and Z. Zhang, “Application of a modified Inception-v3 model in the dynasty-based classification of ancient murals,” EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process., vol. 2021, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13634-021-00740-8.

M. Sholik and C. Fatichah, “Klasifikasi Sel Serviks Pada Citra Pap Smear berdasarkan Fitur Bentuk Deskriptor Regional dan Fitur Tekstur Uniform Rotated Local Binary Pattern,” JUTI J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf., vol. 15, no. 2, p. 214, 2017, doi: 10.12962/j24068535.v15i2.a669.

M. Hassaballah, Y. M. Wazery, I. E. Ibrahim, and A. Farag, “ECG Heartbeat Classification Using Machine Learning and Metaheuristic Optimization for Smart Healthcare Systems,” Bioengineering, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10040429.

S. Supangat, M. Z. Bin Saringat, and M. Y. F. Rochman, “Predicting Handling Covid-19 Opinion using Naive Bayes and TF-IDF for Polarity Detection,” MATRIK J. Manajemen, Tek. Inform. dan Rekayasa Komput., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2023, doi: 10.30812/matrik.v22i2.2227.

A. N. A. Thohari, L. Triyono, I. Hestiningsih, B. Suyanto, and A. Yobioktobera, “Performance Evaluation of Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Network Model for Skin Disease Classification,” JUITA J. Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 9, 2022, doi: 10.30595/juita.v10i1.12041.

Y. Xu, W. Yang, X. Wu, Y. Wang, and J. Zhang, “ResNet Model Automatically Extracts and Identifies FT-NIR Features for Geographical Traceability of Polygonatum kingianum,” Foods, vol. 11, no. 22, 2022, doi: 10.3390/foods11223568.

Y. Sugianela and N. Suciati, “Ekstraksi Fitur Pada Pengenalan Karakter Aksara Jawa Berbasis Histogram of Oriented Gradient,” JUTI J. Ilm. Teknol. Inf., vol. 17, no. 1, p. 64, 2019, doi: 10.12962/j24068535.v17i1.a819.

M. Schramme and J. A. Macías, “Analysis and measurement of internal usability metrics through code annotations,” Softw. Qual. J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1505–1530, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11219-019-09455-4.

M. A. Al-Malla, A. Jafar, and N. Ghneim, “Pre-trained CNNs as Feature-Extraction Modules for Image Captioning: An Experimental Study,” Electron. Lett. Comput. Vis. Image Anal., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2022, doi: 10.5565/rev/elcvia.1436.

M. G Alaslani and L. A. Elrefaei, “Convolutional Neural Network Based Feature Extraction for Iris,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 65–78, 2018, doi: 10.5121/ijcsit.2018.10206.

F. Salim, F. Saeed, S. Basurra, and S. N. Qasem, “DenseNet-201 and Xception Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models for Fruit Recognition,” Electronics, 2023.

I. Hanif, “Implementing Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) Classifier to Improve Customer Churn Prediction,” 2020, doi: 10.4108/eai.2-8-2019.2290338.

C. Sothe et al., “Evaluating a convolutional neural network for feature extraction and tree species classification using uav-hyperspectral images,” ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 193–199, 2020, doi: 10.5194/isprs-Annals-V-3-2020-193-2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j24068535.v22i1.a1214

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.