LOAD FORECASTING FOR DAILY LOAD OPERATIONAL PLAN USING LSTM (CASE STUDY: SOUTH SULAWESI SUB SYSTEM)
Abstract
The electrical load required in an electricity sub-system changes every day. Electric power operators must be able to generate and distribute electricity according to consumer needs. In the Sulawesi sub-system, the power plants used are still dominated by fossil fuel generators, so that in their operations, fuel requirements need to be given serious attention. Planning a good daily electricity consumption is needed so that the fuel cost becomes optimal. In the current condition, the load forecasting for the Daily Load Operation Plan (ROH) is still based on Expert Judgment, which is different for each forecaster. With a fairly large error tolerance limit of 4%. We need a load forecasting instrument capable of better error tolerance. Forecasting methods such as ARIMA, SARIMA and ARIMAX have been used for many years. In recent years, several artificial intelligence techniques such as Neural Network and machine learning have been developed for time series analysis. And recently, more accurate forecasting results are shown by Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) compared to traditional forecasting methods. Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) is a model of RNN that uses past data (Long Term) to predict current data (Short Term). Electric load in Sulawesi subsystem used as data training after normalized using min-max normalization. The LSTM model is made with different data input. Forecasting performance of each model is then evaluated based on the RMSE and MAPE values. Of the several data input models, forecasting models with daily data input show better performance than other scenarios. The MAPE and RMSE values obtained were 2.384% and 33.95, respectively.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
H. Eskandari, M. Imani, and M. P. Moghaddam, “Convolutional and recurrent neural network based model for short-term load forecasting,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 195, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107173.
B. Zhao, T. Qian, W. Tang, and Q. Liang, “A data-enhanced distributionally robust optimization method for economic dispatch of integrated electricity and natural gas systems with wind uncertainty,” Energy, vol. 243, p. 123113, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.123113.
X. Guo, Q. Zhao, S. Wang, D. Shan, and W. Gong, “A Short-Term Load Forecasting Model of LSTM Neural Network considering Demand Response,” Complexity, vol. 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/5571539.
A. Rafati, M. Joorabian, and E. Mashhour, “An efficient hour-ahead electrical load forecasting method based on innovative features,” Energy, vol. 201, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117511.
C. Shang, J. Gao, H. Liu, and F. Liu, “Short-term load forecasting based on PSO-KFCM daily load curve clustering and CNN-LSTM model,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 50344–50357, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067043.
M. Chazarra, J. I. Pérez-Díaz, J. García-González, and A. Helseth, “Economic effects of forecasting inaccuracies in the automatic frequency restoration service for the day-ahead energy and reserve scheduling of pumped storage plants,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 174, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.epsr.2019.04.028.
J. Lee and Y. Cho, “National-scale electricity peak load forecasting: Traditional, machine learning, or hybrid model?,” Energy, vol. 239, p. 122366, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122366.
F. Petropoulos et al., “Forecasting: theory and practice,” International Journal of Forecasting. Elsevier B.V., 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001.
H. Khani and H. E. Z. Farag, “Optimal Day-Ahead Scheduling of Power-to-Gas Energy Storage and Gas Load Management in Wholesale Electricity and Gas Markets,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 9, no. 2, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2767064.
M. Basirat and P. M. Roth, “Learning Task-specific Activation Functions using Genetic Programming,” in VISIGRAPP 2019 - Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, 2019, vol. 5, pp. 533–540. doi: 10.5220/0007408205330540.
“Flow chart,” Mathematical Statistics with Applications in R, p. xxi, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-817815-7.09001-1.
J. Du, Y. Cheng, Q. Zhou, J. Zhang, X. Zhang, and G. Li, “Power Load Forecasting Using BiLSTM-Attention,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 440, no. 3, p. 032115, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/440/3/032115.
R. Indralaksono, A. M. Firdaus, M. A. Wakhid, N. U. Andreas, G. H. Wibowo, and M. Abdillah, “Short-Term Load Forecasting using Long Short-Term Memory Network on Various Sub System Load in PLN Indonesia,” in 2021 International Conference on Technology and Policy in Energy and Electric Power (ICT-PEP), Sep. 2021, pp. 175–179. doi: 10.1109/ICT-PEP53949.2021.9601005.
K. Vijayaprabakaran and K. Sathiyamurthy, “Towards activation function search for long short-term model network: A differential evolution based approach,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.04.015.
S. Saha, N. Nagaraj, A. Mathur, and R. Yedida, “Evolution of Novel Activation Functions in Neural Network Training with Applications to Classification of Exoplanets,” Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2020-000098-9.
L. Parisi, R. Ma, N. RaviChandran, and M. Lanzillotta, “hyper-sinh: An accurate and reliable function from shallow to deep learning in TensorFlow and Keras,” Machine Learning with Applications, vol. 6, p. 100112, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.MLWA.2021.100112.
T. Chai, T. Chai, and R. R. Draxler, “Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? Ozone health and ecosystem impacts View project Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?-Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature,” Geosci. Model Dev, vol. 7, pp. 1247–1250, 2014, doi: 10.5194/gmdd-7-1525-2014.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12962/j24068535.v20i2.a1138
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
